I want to tell you a story about how the internet changed. It used to be the case that most content on the world wide web was created by rich white English-speaking men. The web was created by one: Tim Berners-Lee. The leading online commentators of the 90s – people like John Dvorak – fit this profile as well. But it’s not the case anymore.
- Today, the most popular blog on the web is Arianna Huffington’s (top of the technorati 100).
- Most blogs are written by women (35% of online teen girls blog compared to 20% of guys).
- Teens from families earning less than $50,000 are almost twice as likely to blog as are teens from richer families. (source)
And that gender and income gap is growing. Why weren’t women contributing to the web as much before? It wasn’t because they lacked access. 90% of US teens can access the Internet from their home today and that’s about the same percentage as in the year 2000. Instead, people weren’t contributing content to the web because they found it too difficult.
- Women are far more likely to say that they would “need to ask a friend for help” in order to upload a file to a web site than are men
- Men have long been far more likely to share video and photos online than women, but when broadband internet and social networking sites like facebook made it really easy to share these files, the gender balance flipped and women became the primary sharers of media online
In a nutshell, social networking, blogs, and other web 2.0 technologies were what finally got a lot of otherwise disenfranchised people to contribute to the web. And this was a tremendously positive development, not least because it meant that about half the American population, a whole lot of females, and poorer people became truly included in the netscape and it amplified the voice of proud islamists, book authors and new associations.
My contention is that wikipedia is in their equivalent of the pre-blog era. Most wikipedia users today are male, rich, urban, and young. For example, three-quarters of internet-using seniors have never been to the wikipedia site, whereas most college grads have. And when wikipedia draws on such a subset of the population, we all lose out because areas of human knowledge are under-represented and under-developed in the encyclopedia.
Let’s find our wikipedia-equivalent of the Proud Islamist, a new voice brought to prominence because of enabling technology. Just as the likes of blogs induced women to contribute content online (even though homepage creation sites like geocities had been available for years), my prediction is that introducing WYSIWYG editing in wikipedia, creating a workable discussion and messaging system, and generally focusing on usability would have a similar effect, changing the gender, income, and age of the typical wikipedia contributor. What changes might we expect? Surely, the interesting changes will be the ones that I can’t easily predict.
- Women disproportionately use the internet to look for information about religion, health, and personal problems, so I’d bet on those areas of wikipedia flourishing (Source)
- Teenage girls are far more likely to upload photos to the web than are teenage boys; if more wikipedia contributors were female I would expect to see more visuals on the site
- Females are significantly more likely to use the internet for communication (instant messaging, writing on a facebook wall, using an online chat room) than are males; I’d expect to see the discussion pages flourish
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on Women and the Web: What Works, What Doesn’t, and What Wikipedia Can Learn )
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on Is It Just Me, or Is One Cover Designer Getting Way Too Much Business? )
Case 1: I moved to BC two weeks ago. The first thing that I did was get my BC driver’s licence; it arrived in the mail today. It came along with an organ donor registration card. But I can’t register to be an organ donor in BC. Because I have an Ontario Health Card, not a BC one. And you need to have a BC ‘Care Card’ in order to so register. And here’s the kicker: I won’t be eligible for one until I’ve lived in BC for three months. So I can’t have my organ donor status listed on my driver’s licence. It’s a small hole in the system that shouldn’t exist.
Case 2: A participant in my Katimavik cluster went to the doctor the other day. But they’re from Quebec and Quebec doesn’t have a reciprocal agreement with BC to recognize each other’s health cards. So this participant had to pay out of pocket and submit paperwork to the Quebec government for reimbursement. It’s annoying. And more than that, it’s an impediment which limits the access of a Canadian Citizen to health care.
Our Prime Minister is set to meet with the Canadian Premiers next week. In the leadup, we’re hearing much gladhanding about their record and terms like new era of federal-provincial relations are being bandied. But there are festering inter-provincial issues. They affect our lives. They impede the mobility, the health, the security of Canadians. And they’re likely to be addressed only if there’s a strong federal government which compels the provinces to co-operate.
If the provinces don’t like a heavyhanded Ottawa, so be it. That’s why I’m a federalist. It shouldn’t be easier to move from Spain to Belgium than it is to move between two Canadian provinces. It just shouldn’t.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( Comments Off on An ode to the days of strong federal governments )
« Previous Entries